Search

 
  In this section  
  Publications  
    ACNielsen Insights Asia Pacific  
    Consumer Insight Magazine  
    RFID: Insights Beyond the Bar Code  
  Reports and Studies  
  Related information  
  Business Issues  
    Brand Dynamics  
    Category Dynamics  
    Competitive Analysis  
    Consumer Loyalty  
    Distribution  
    Location Information Management  
    Market Dynamics  
    New Brand Launch  
    New Product Introductions  
    Pricing  
    Product Opportunities  
    Promotion Efficiency and Effectiveness  
    Retail Performance  
    Understanding the Consumer  
 
Trends & Insights     >     Publications   >     Consumer Insight Magazine

TrendWatch—Childhood Obesity: A Fat New Opportunity for Marketers

You can hardly open a newspaper or switch on the news these days without hearing fresh outrage about childhood obesity. The message? Too many kids are too fat—and something has to change.

The media began feeding on this topic in early 2001 when Surgeon General David Satcher issued a report that cited obesity as a major cause of premature deaths in Americans. Without policy changes by the food industry, schools and the government, he warned, obesity would surpass tobacco as the leading cause of preventable deaths.

Nearly 60 percent of U.S. adults and 15 percent of children ages 6–19 are overweight. That translates to about nine million overweight and obese children. Childhood obesity rates are much higher among the poor and in urban populations. Childhood obesity leads to diseases such as diabetes and asthma as well as heart and liver disease.

The focus on childhood obesity has generated lawsuits against major fast food restaurants, congressional inquiries on the nutritional value of school lunches, legislative proposals and an increase in awareness among mothers of the nutritional content in their children’s meals. There is also an increased focus on snack and food advertising targeted to children.

The most well publicized lawsuit was filed in August by the parents of two Bronx, NY, children who became obese and developed health problems after regularly eating hamburgers and french fries at McDonald’s. A U.S. District Court judge in Manhattan recently dismissed this suit. Had the lawsuit been successful, it could have spawned thousands of similar lawsuits against restaurants and food companies. Other experts have pointed out that schools that give beverage and snack-food companies exclusive rights to sell their goods in vending machines might also be open to lawsuits.

The nutritional value of food in school cafeterias is expected to be the focus of debate in Congress in the coming months as lawmakers look at renewing school lunch and other child nutrition programs overseen by the U.S. Agriculture Department.

In some ways the response to the childhood obesity epidemic is following what experts call the “tobacco model.” Not only have there been individual and class-action lawsuits, but snack taxes are also being discussed around the country. State legislatures in California, Washington, Kentucky, Tennessee, Vermont and Nebraska have introduced bills in the past two years to tax soft drinks or snack foods. Only recently have proponents of food taxes started using anti-obesity language to justify these snack taxes.

The packaged food and fast food industries have responded to this assault with many of the expected PR responses. Food companies have invested in campaigns promoting exercise and balanced diets, and denied that their products were at the root of America’s fat problem. Hershey Foods and McDonald’s gave grants to the International Food Information Council to set up a web site to encourage children to exercise more. Trade groups joined forces last year to help fund obesity research and lobby Congress to make schools require gym classes.

The childhood obesity epidemic has causes beyond the foods, snacks and drinks that kids consume. The elimination of recess and physical education classes and the tendency for kids to spend more time on computers, watching TV, or playing video games are also critical elements of the problem. Parents also have responsibility for the food their children consume.

Food and restaurant companies can point their fingers at the other reasons for the epidemic, but the perception among many consumers is that food companies are not doing enough in the area of providing healthy eating options. Food companies can respond by offering statistics and PR programs or they can develop and market healthier products that meet the needs of consumers.

Companies must be more realistic about serving sizes and also work to reduce calorie and fat content in existing and new products. Marketers will also need to be very sensitive about the way they advertise their food and beverage products to children. The focus on childhood obesity will definitely present challenges to some categories and brands, but there are huge opportunities for those companies that provide innovation and leadership in product development and marketing.




Email this page

Download PDF
(207k)



More Trends & Insights

Executive Insight

Effective Targeting: Unifying Segmentation and Market Structure

Navigating the Road to Hollywood

Targeting Early Adopters: A Means for New Product Survival

Building a Better Online Media Plan

The Economy, the Consumer and the 2003 Retail Outlook

Global Mega Brand Franchises: Extending Brands Within a Global Marketplace

© The Nielsen Company Sitemap             Privacy policy             Terms of use             Help             Contact Nielsen Answers login